How to insult clinicians

DSC00264edp

In my blog post Total Error and Milan, I mentioned how clinician surveys were in the draft consensus statement but dropped from the final and published consensus statement. (The draft consensus statement is no longer available on the EFLM site).

I had occasion to read a paper from the Milan conference (1) where it is clear why clinician surveys were dropped.

“RCVs from vignettes should probably not be used on their own as a basis for setting analytical performance specifications, since clinicians seem “uninformed” regarding important principles.”

RCV = reference change values.

For an example of how clinician surveys were used to set analytical performance specifications, see reference 2.

References

  1. Thue G and Sandberg S: Analytical performance specifications based on how clinicians use laboratory tests Clin Chem Lab Med 2015; 53(6): 857–862.
  2. Klonoff DC, Lias C, Vigersky R, et al The surveillance error grid. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014;8:658-672.
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: