New Names Won’t Help

CLSI publishes clinical laboratory standards, but these days the rate at which the standards are appearing is painfully slow. So recently, CLSI came out with a revised, streamlined process. From what I can see the process hasn’t changed at all other than certain names. Thus:

Area committee->consensus committee
Area committee observer-> Area committee reviewer

Subcommittee->document development committee
Subcommittee advisor-> document development contributor
Subcommittee observer -> document development contributor

New names won’t help, better leadership is needed. The key individual is the chairholder of the area committee (now consensus committee). When I was head of the Evaluation Protocols area committee (now consensus committee) I got three documents published that each had no action for 13 years! And I did this without new names.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: